 |
DEDUCTIONS COMMITTEE UPDATE |
March 2002
|
|
|
The Deductions Update is
published periodically to provide progress reports on deductions activities for
manufacturers, distributors and sales and marketing agents. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVEST TIME AND
DISCIPLINE IN DEDUCTIONS, SAYS STUDY |
|
The results are in from a
benchmarking study to assess the adoption of the ECR Deductions Guidelines
by the Canadian grocery industry. According to David Wilkes, CCGD, “The
results prove that best practices work very effectively for those
companies that invest the time and discipline against the process.” The
study, conducted in November 2001 by PricewaterhouseCoopers, included
input from 26 manufacturers and nine distributors.
The study shows that there has been significant
progress made against the issue of unexplained deductions. “Those
companies that are following the best practices put forward by the
industry are having success,” says Elaine Smith, FCPMC. “Deductions are
mainly an issue between those manufacturers and retailers who do not have
the processes or relationships in place to manage deductions
effectively.” The study also showed that there are areas for improvement
in the application of contract numbers, authorizations and training of
staff.
Other study highlights include:
- 90% of respondents are
aware of best practices that can reduce unexplained deductions.
- 82% of unexplained
deductions claimed are considered valid, but are not accompanied by
appropriate documentation.
- Inclusion of timing of
activity, type of activity and amount of deduction are practices that
have been adopted by the bulk of the distributors.
- 67% of distributors
are reporting that they are spending less time with deductions with none
reporting more.
- Unexplained deductions
associated with post audits are considered valid in only 61% of the
cases.
- 35% of manufacturers
are reporting that unexplained deductions have increased compared to two
years ago, while 41% feel they have decreased.
- Both distributors and
manufactures agree that the reason for the decline in unexplained
deductions can be traced to proper communication, efficient internal
work processes and proper documentation.
|
| |
|
STUDY
SUGGESTS 5-STEP PROCESS TO SUCCESS |
|
The study findings
revealed a number of opportunities for improving the deductions process
among supply chain partners. Specifically, the study suggests that the
following 5-step process will help companies improve deductions with
trading partners:
-
Implement training programs. As personnel
changes, it is imperative that companies review the best practices.
- Always use contract
numbers and manufacturer/distributor authorization. Results show that
these are currently used infrequently.
- Make deductions a key performance
indicator.
- Include deductions in business reviews
with trading partners.
- Review internal
processes and re-engineer as appropriate.
|
| |
|
GUIDELINES
CREATED IN 1999 CONTINUE TO BE ENDORSED |
|
The industry continues to
endorse the implementation of Deductions Guidelines established for the
grocery industry through the ECR initiative. In 1999, the ECR Steering
Committee agreed that deductions were a non-value added activity for
manufacturers, distributors, retailers, and sales and marketing agents.
In conjunction with retailers and manufacturers, a process analysis was
conducted and the following recommendations were made to help companies
manage deductions with their trading partners:
- Deductions must be
processed with a contract number, date and activity tied to the
deduction amount and sign off.
- Post audits were to be
capped at two years.
It was
recommended that an eight-week lead time on price increases be adopted to
alleviate many deductions issues |
| |
|
|
|
If you have any questions, please fax back
this form to the Committee c/o:
|
| |